Wednesday, January 9, 2019

Movie #4 of 100: "Incredibles 2"


Movie 4/100: “Incredibles 2”
Overall Thoughts:
The internet is full of gushing praise for just about everything Pixar does, and while this movie didn’t quite live up to the original for me (more on that later on), I still though it was a really entertaining and thoughtful film.
The main premise of the film, with Holly Hunter’s Elasti-girl taking on the role of main family superhero felt a bit derivative of the first movie, in which Mr. Incredible was doing undercover hero work under the guise of a “straight job.”
This time, the whole idea behind bringing Helen Parr back into the hero fold is to try to get laws banning superheroes overturned, and Bob Odenkirk does a really nice job as the business executive trying to make that happen. That element of the movie was much more interesting, and definitely was fleshed out with all of the positives and negatives fully vetted on screen.
The main selling point of the narrative, as many others have surely mentioned, is Bob Parr (Craig T. Nelson) having to deal with being Mr. Dad instead of Mr. Incredible. Learning how to juggle the responsibilities and the roles of a father, therapist, and cheerleader, for his kids gave the movie some of its finest emotional juice, and the writing and execution of that portion of the story were both top-notch.
In terms of the villain and stakes, the movie certainly delivers. The idea of a Screenslaver-type character feels appropriate in an age where we’re all addicted to the little computers in our pockets (and felt like a bit of a personal attack for me, since I watched three movies on the day I saw this film), and the motivations behind the character made for a compelling antagonist.
My complaints about the movie center around how Helen Parr’s “job” mirrored the role of her husband in the first film, and a much smaller quibble: that Dash Parr didn’t seem to get as much of his character fleshed out as his sister Violet and brother Jack Jack did. That can probably be at least somewhat explained by the fact that he got some narrative baggage in the first film (not being able to participate in sports, and rebelling against the notion that he had to keep his powers secret), but it still would have been nice to have seen that thread stretched out a bit further.
Favorite Performance:
Nelson’s performance as Mr. Incredible was top-notch, as it was in the first film. His transition from the bread-winning hero to the behind-the-scenes rock was a compelling development in the story arc of the family, and his earnest attempts to help out his children, and his wife, during a time of transition both at the familial and societal levels made for a great watch.
I also have to shout out Catherine Keener, who brought a lot of heft to her role as Evelyn Deavor. Odenkirk obviously steals a lot of scenes because of his upbeat and high-volume dialogue, but Keener provided a fantastic counter-weight to him and made for an ideal sibling, all things considered.
Favorite Scene:
The contrast between Bob Parr’s dedication to helping Dash with his math homework, where he was wildly dedicated and ultimately successful, and his complete and total failure in helping Violet get a date with her love interest was absolutely stellar. When taken together, those scenes perfectly encapsulate how life can hand you a massive success with one hand and then slap you with the reality that you’re not perfect with the other.
Naturally, the scene in which Jack Jack gets to show off his powers for the first time was both dazzling visually and just an hysterical scene in general. The tension that the audience feels as it becomes increasingly unclear whether the infant’s “adversary” will survive the encounter only adds to the effectiveness of the scene.
Stars: 3.5 out of 5

Movie #3 of 100: "Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse"


Movie 3/100: “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse”
Overall Thoughts:
There has been a lot of concern expressed that we are going to hit comic book movie fatigue at some point, that movies about these heroes are going to become so commonplace that movie-goers are going to rebel against the idea of putting more caped crusaders on screen.
It’s probably a good thing then that Spider-Man doesn’t wear a cape.
“Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” was, without a question in my mind, the best movie about the web-slinging hero. That is not meant as a knock on Tom Holland, who has done a wonderful job in the separate MCU films about the hero, but Miles Morales, ably played by Shameik Moore, is a fantastic new addition to the comic book world, and his story is a downright fascinating one.
Given how many times Spider-Man’s origins have been put up on the big, and small, screens, the movie’s insistence on telling every Spider-incarnation’s story as if it is the last time it will be done is downright hilarious. It is a great nod to the amount of times we’ve been subjected to “With great power comes great responsibility,” and it is a great jumping off point for a movie that likes to push the boundaries of what a comic book movie can be.
The thing that makes Spider-Man so easy for movie-goers to identify with is that he didn’t get his powers as a result of lucky genetics, some lab experiment gone wrong, or a suit of armor that he designed in his laboratory. Instead, Miles Morales got his powers because he happened to be in the right subway tunnel at the right time, and he gets forced into taking on an identity that he did not choose.
That conflict is one of the movie’s central backbones, and this movie does a great job of portraying the superhero who didn’t get to choose his path forward. Right from the word go, Miles knows that he needs to use his powers for good to help humanity, but the reality is that there is a lot more to being a hero than shooting webs from your wrists and having incredible reaction time. There is an impact on everyone around you, and the “great responsibility” part of the quote is where this movie mines most of its emotional ore.
The filmmakers did a wonderful job of capturing that conflict, and they also did that while managing to pull together a narrative that was based on alternate dimensions and characters with similar, but also vastly different, motivations. Phil Lord, who has been doing a great job with the “Lego” movie franchise, and Rodney Rothman did a great job of balancing the chaotic nature of the story with the very human elements of the narrative, and it made for a wonderfully fast-paced, but nuanced, production.
Finally, the animation style, which I worried about, ended up being one of the film’s biggest strengths. The filmmakers used the animation to full advantage, taking the technique to places that it has never been before. It made for a very pleasant, and very visually appealing, presentation, and it was a delight to watch on the big screen.
Favorite Performance:
Peter B. Parker, played by Jake Johnson, was everything that Ben Affleck’s Batman was supposed to be. A hero who still very much believes in his duty to humanity, while still grappling with the impact that commitment has on those that he loves.
Johnson’s ability to balance the “do-gooder” motivations that drive Spider-Man with the exhaustion that comes with watching his personal life crumble as a result of his incessant hero-ing is a delight in the film, and the way he was able to convincingly portray his transformation from reluctant guru to full-on cheerleader of Morales’ exploits was one of the movie’s most fun and satisfying elements.
Brian Tyree Henry, who plays Morales’ father Jefferson Davis, nearly stole the show with his performance. The way he is able to go from the lame, pun-making dad to a fully fleshed out character that is able to connect with his son on an emotional level and inspire him to do things that he has no idea he’s inspiring him to do, is truly remarkable, and if he were to blare a siren at me and force me to say that I loved him, I would have to acquiesce.
Favorite Scenes:
The final showdown between the Spider-People and Kingpin was a cinematic marvel, with the reality-bending animation very accurately portraying the sheer insanity of what was going on.
Aside from that, the scene that most resonated with me was the scene where Davis, who takes off his hat as a very subtle way of expressing vulnerability and sadness, really opens up to Miles for the first time. The pair, separated by a doorway, share a remarkably tender moment, and the fact that Morales doesn’t even say a word while his father opens up to him makes the scene all the more touching.
Stars: 4 out of 5


Monday, January 7, 2019

Movie #2 of 100: "The Greatest Showman"


Movie 2/100: “The Greatest Showman”
Overall Thoughts:
So often in musicals, the dialogue and the narrative are merely tools to get between songs, and while this movie wasn’t entirely an exception to that, there were surprisingly good moments of character development that did help draw me in as a viewer.
If I had to guess, director Michael Gracey deliberately had Hugh Jackman’s portrayal of P.T. Barnum serve as a kind of gateway to the other characters of the film, allowing their narratives to begin to take center stage as the movie went on. He seemed to fade into the background, happy to allow others to take their turn the spotlight, and with an actor as charismatic as Jackman, that was a really gutsy decision by Gracey.
Throughout the early stages of the movie, you’re confronted with the question of how Barnum would be able to convince these folks, who clearly have been shunned by society, to showcase their talents and unique characteristics, and ultimately the narrative arc of the film leads them to accept themselves, and in a way that isn’t a magical and formulaic “I love me for me” story.
Visually the movie was very appealing, with blasts of color and spectacle all over the place.
The music in the film was really well done. “Rewrite the Stars” was a tremendous song and a great performance by Zendaya and Zac Efron, and Keala Settle, who plays the Bearded Lady in the movie, does an incredible job on “This is Me,” the movie’s moment where the performers in Barnum’s circus really embrace their place in the world.
Finally, I have to give a lot of credit to Benj Pasek and Justin Paul, who really did a wonderful job in their follow-up to 2016’s “La La Land.” Their songwriting skills are very evident in both movies, and while some movie musicals end up producing only one truly remarkable song, the duo was able to really hit the nail on the head on numerous tracks on the soundtrack.
Ultimately, while the music was great and there were some really good performances, it seemed as though the narrative structure wasn’t there to provide a backbone to the movie. Jackman did a really nice job of getting the audience to get swept up in his grand vision, but didn’t do as good of a job selling the image of the self-absorbed jerk that he moves toward in the movie’s middle stages.
I also didn’t feel that Efron was properly utilized. I would have liked to have seen more of his character.
Favorite Performance:
I thought Zendaya’s portrayal of Anne Wheeler, the trapeze artist who feels like she’s tip-toeing around a world that she has no real place in, was spot on. Her grace in her movements was a great example of acting without speaking, and needless to say, her vocal performances in her songs were top notch.
I also very much like Keala Settle’s performance as Lettie Lutz, the woman who ultimately becomes the de facto leader of the “band of misfits” that performs in Barnum’s show. She goes from being absolutely ashamed of her appearance to being a confident woman who recognizes her value both as a person and as a performer, and seeing her development in both of those roles was a really strong bit of acting.
Favorite Scene:
Honorable mentions go to the scene when Efron’s character Phillip Carlyle is negotiating with Barnum over a role with the act, as the choreography and the song were both extremely entertaining and engrossing.
Settle’s performance in “This is Me,” where the circus performers are walking through the midst of a champagne-soaked party to the horror of party guests, was excellent and worthy of an honorable mention spot as well.
Ultimately, the scene that will probably stay with me the most is the gorgeously shot and choreographed scene where Efron and Zendaya sing about their love for one another, and about the societal circumstances that seem destined to keep them apart.
Everything about the scene worked on just about every level, and it was probably the movie’s most breathtaking bit of theatrics, a high compliment for a film about the art of entertainment.
Stars: 3 out of 5

Saturday, January 5, 2019

Movie #1 of 100: "Reservoir Dogs"


Movie 1/100: “Reservoir Dogs”
Seen: 1/4/19
Overall Thoughts:
Having never seen this movie before, I went into it expecting the standard fare for a Tarantino flick: tons of violence, cursing, and strong dialogue.
I ended up getting those things and then some. The violence never had a particularly funny edge to it, as violence is wont to do with the amount of brutality that was on display in this film, and several scenes, including the one with Michael Madsen torturing a police officer, were definitely hard to watch.
Interspersed with those types of scenes were great narrative bits of the film, including a great scene with Tim Roth in which he explains his backstory through a series of flashbacks. That flashback theme was used to great effect in terms of humanizing these men who were almost sub-human in their approach to the job at hand, and I very much appreciated that.
Obviously I have plenty of opinions on how the movie ended, but I think it went roughly in the direction that it needed to. It didn’t pull any punches in the final minutes, and the emotional and physical elements of the final moments were breathtaking.
Favorite Performance:
It’s easy to go with Madsen since he was so horrifically, and gleefully, brutal, in his scenes, but I’m leaning more toward Steve Buscemi and Tim Roth. Buscemi was fantastic in several scenes, including the opening one in a diner where he rails against the practice of tipping, and in scenes where he was interacting with Harvey Keitel, who has been thus far unmentioned but definitely was great in his role as Mr. White.
Favorite Scene:
Madsen’s sadistic thrill in the torture scene definitely made the podium for me in terms of favorite scene, and the ending was fantastic as well, but I’m going to stick with the scene where Mr. Orange, played by Roth, is lying bleeding in Mr. White’s arms. The sheer horror of knowing that death is a very real possibility was portrayed both on Roth’s face and in his words, and Keitel’s attempts at both comforting him, and in being logical with him about his predicament, were all incredibly well executed and directed by the actors and Tarantino.
Stars: 4 of 5 

Friday, March 3, 2017

My Top 10 X-Men Universe Films



With the release of “Logan” in theaters this weekend, Hugh Jackman has officially said goodbye to the X-Men universe, and his run as Wolverine will go down in history as one of the most memorable runs by an actor as an iconic character. 



In total, Jackman appeared in nine of the 10 X-Men films, with last year’s “Deadpool” being the only exception (much to Ryan Reynolds’ chagrin, I’m sure). Throughout the franchise, Jackman’s unique hairstyle, ripped physique, and dedication to getting the character right always shined through, and it could certainly be argued that without him, the franchise may not have gotten to the point that it has gotten to now. 

Thursday, June 18, 2015

Reflections on Covering the Stanley Cup Final

As most of you know, I recently had the privilege of receiving a media credential from the NHL for the Stanley Cup Final, and I was fortunate enough to witness the Chicago Blackhawks clinch the championship on home ice for the first time in 78 years.


I’ve obviously written extensively about what the championship means to the team, and I’m sure I’ll have plenty more thoughts on where the squad goes from here, but at the behest of a good friend of mine, I’m going to take a more personal track with this particular blog post.

To set the scene, she (you’ll know her on Twitter as the incredible @schatzipage) asked me what it was like to be at the arena for the three games that the Blackhawks played at the United Center during the Final, and I figured that instead of giving her a direct message with a partial thought on the matter, I would allow myself the freedom and the space to fully describe the experience.

First and foremost, there was a sense of incredible validation for the work that I have put in over the years. Whether it was with Bruce Hollingdrake at The Hockey Writers, or with Christopher Ralph at Paint it Blackhawks, or with my current job at NBC Chicago, I have been writing about the Blackhawks for the better part of six years now, and to be in the building for such a momentous series in the history of the franchise felt like a reward for all of that hard work that led to this moment.


Aside from the rewarding aspect of it, there was also the sense of awe as I looked around the press room. I am well aware of the bum rap that media members get at times, but when I look at a group that includes Pierre LeBrun, Bob Verdi, and a host of other incredibly talented writers and reporters, I can’t help but feel that I have no place at that table. These guys are rock stars in my eyes, and I have to admit that I was a bit starstruck.


That feeling did pass eventually, and it was replaced by one of motivation and determination. Using the knowledge of how hard I’ve worked to get to this point, I chose to look at this more as a stepping stone than as something that I didn’t feel worthy of, and it has strengthened my resolve to become a better writer and reporter, and I hope that you all see the fruits of those labors over the coming months and years as my career continues.


Of course, I would be lying if I said that I didn’t take every chance I could to step back and take in the spectacle of the event itself. Seeing the city embrace the team, hearing the roar of the arena as goals were scored and as Jim Cornelison sang the national anthem, and just being around these players as they fought tooth and nail for a goal that they have been going after ever since they were kids were all things that I’m never going to forget, and I hope that the photographic and video records of these experiences will be enough to trigger those memories that I made while in that building.

There is one experience that kind of sums that up perfectly, if you’ll indulge the anecdote. Following Game 4 of the series, the Blackhawks had just tied things up and were justifiably jubilant about doing so. Jonathan Toews and Brandon Saad were in the media room to do their interviews, and I naturally wanted to ask a question so that I could write up a story for NBC.


What follows perfectly illustrates how I feel in having played a small part in the narrative of this series. When I asked my question, I obviously got the answer I needed to write a post about Saad’s role on the team, but I got a lot more than that. First, my wife said she heard me ask the question on CSN Chicago’s postgame coverage. Then my buddy DJ said that he heard me ask the question on ESPN 1000 following the game. Finally, the Blackhawks’ Snapchat account just so happened to capture the moment that Saad was answering my question, with my big goofy head taking up the bottom portion of the screen.


That’s when it hit me that this was more than just simply doing my job as a reporter. I was part of something much bigger than myself, and I am deeply grateful to have gotten this opportunity.

I think that ultimately is going to be my biggest takeaway from the entire experience. Meeting and reconnecting with all sorts of different writers was cool. Getting the validation that this particular press pass came with was deeply appreciated. Beyond all of that, just playing a bit part in the bigger drama of the Stanley Cup Final is something that I will always feel profoundly lucky for, and I’m going to savor every memory that I possess.

Friday, January 17, 2014

Cubs to Honor 100th Anniversary of Wrigley With Throwback Jerseys

The Chicago Cubs' annual fan convention kicked off today in the Windy City, and the overarching theme this year (aside from whether the team will sign pitcher Masahiro Tanaka) is the 100-year anniversary of Wrigley Field.

As a matter of historical record, the Cubs will NOT be celebrating their 100th anniversary of playing at the ballpark on April 23rd of this year. The Chicago Whales of the Federal League were the first tenants of Wrigley, and when that league folded, Charles Weeghman got the Cubs and brought them to play at the stadium, which occurred in 1916.

With that caveat aside, the Cubs will honor the centennial celebration with a series of throwback uniforms on Sundays all season long. For those of you without a Twitter account, I collected these pictures from Chicago Cubs Online:

We'll actually start with the new gray alternate jersey the Cubs will wear starting this season:
Here's the Chicago Whales jersey they will wear on April 23rd:

On May 4th they will wear this gorgeous jersey from 1929:

This 1937 jersey will be worn on May 18th:

On June 8th, this splendid 1942 jersey will hit the field:

The Cubs will throwback to 1953 with these jerseys on June 22nd:

Remember the heartbreak of 1969? Then you probably don't want to go to Wrigley on July 13th:

July 27th will be another strong day in terms of jerseys with these blue beauties from 1978:

The lights turned on at Wrigley Field in 1988, and just two days after the 26th anniversary of that date, the Cubs will don these jerseys on August 10th:

On August 24th, these mid-1990's Cubs jerseys will be on display at the Friendly Confines:

Finally, the Cubs will honor the 2008 team that won 97 games on September 7th: